Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 08:23

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Is there any concrete proof that LED face masks actually work?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Traders Scour for ‘Elusive’ Catalyst to Push S&P 500 to Record - Bloomberg
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Cosmic Dawn with Nobel Laureate John Mather - NASA (.gov)
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Bluetooth flaws could let hackers spy through your microphone - BleepingComputer